🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold action to restrict social platforms access for young people below 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and families are monitoring closely to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Movement

Across Europe, a rising chorus of nations are exploring parallel bans.

• The Danish government has announced a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister declaring that mobile devices and apps are "taking away our children's innocence". The policy is expected to be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard young people from the "influence of the AI".
• The Irish government is working on a digital ID system to verify the user details of social media participants. Authorities have indicated that an similar ban remains "one of the tools under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has asked parliament to pass a law increasing the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has recommended a related step, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has recommended families to restrict their youngsters from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has approved a non-binding statement supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 except if a parent decides otherwise is given. Although it warns of the "compulsive" quality of these services, the step does not establish binding law.

"An effective age barrier is a solid foundation," said one MEP supporting the resolution.

Britain: A Cautious Approach

In the UK, the government has remained open to a potential ban, emphasizing that "nothing is being dismissed" but stressing any decision must be "supported by strong research".

Last year, support grew behind a proposal to enact controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately watered down. Instead, the government vowed to conduct more studies the matter.

Campaign organizations have voiced concerns. A prominent charity set up by the loved ones of a girl who was lost after encountering harmful social media material argues that a simple age ban may not protect children and could lead to a "cliff edge" of risk when young people turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the inability of the Silicon Valley to create products and services that are appropriate and suitable for children," commented a leading child protection advocate.

America: A State-by-State Landscape

Across America, legislation is mostly unfolding at the state level against a backdrop of national stalemate.

• Utah requires parental consent for under-18s to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has signed a measure banning under-14s from accessing social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a rule restricting minors to one hour of social media use per day, with additional access needing adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise passed bills demanding adult authorization for teenagers to set up social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from some politicians to follow Australia's path, a nationwide ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Views

Beyond the West, further states are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to prohibit social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, international agencies adopt a more nuanced position. A major UN agency has advised that social media bans carry risks and "might have unintended consequences". The body points out that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for isolated children and that bans should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to invest in user protection.

As this worldwide discussion unfolds, the steps of Australia and its followers demonstrate that governments internationally are no longer willing to delay for tech companies to self-regulate.